Eric S. Raymond wrote: > What happened is that your version failed to pass an error exception = upwards > after fielding it. My test case was a buggy version of = cmlconfigure.py, bug > since fixed. >=20 > Cleanliness is good, but the code has to work first. umm. as far as I can tell from the patch, there's no way your code can work in a situation where try/finally wouldn't do exactly the same thing. if you *do* get different results (try inserting "raise whatever" in the try clause to test this), it might be that you've stumbled upon a real bug (either in Python or in the curses C bindings)... </F>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4