mal wrote:
> The above looks a lot like an iterator... how about
> providing a standard PySequence_Iterate(obj, callback)
> with the callback being called for every element of the
> sequence ?!
PySequence_Enumerate, perhaps?
> The iterator could then be optimized for lists and tuples.
> Not as fast as inlining, but a more generic solution...
more generic than useful, imo:
- it's slower.
- it's awkward to use: you need to put the state in a
structure, invert your program logic, etc.
- it doesn't scale: what if you want to loop over two
structures? what if you want to loop over two objects,
using two different indices?
</F>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4