/F: > just for the record, I just changed some generic sequence code > to something like: ... > so in other words, this construct is more than 4 times faster > than plain use of PySequence_GetItem. Good stuff! > guess it's time to fix a couple of things in PIL... Its a fair bit of code to duplicate everywhere you want the speed increase. How can we add a similar scheme to the core, so the changes people need to make are trivial (to the point where the change is zero!)? Mark.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4