On Wed, Jun 14, 2000 at 10:43:45AM +0200, M . -A . Lemburg wrote: > > I guess it's a bug... a subtle one though, because in a > certain sense both 1 and 0 are acceptable. But since > '' is considered to be false, I think that returning 0 > makes more sense. > > I'll fix this to return 0 for emtpy strings and Unicode objects. These are copied from Java, are they not? What do the Java equivalents return? Trent -- Trent Mick trentm@activestate.com
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4