Barry A. Warsaw [bwarsaw@python.org] wrote: > > >>>>> "M" == M <mal@lemburg.com> writes: > > M> How about building two versions of the interpreter per default: > M> one with threads enabled and one without threads ? > > Python 1.6, current CVS snapshot on a Dell PIII 650, RH 6.1. > > with threads: 8547.01 pystones/second > without threads: 9259.26 pystones/second > > So an 8% hit isn't negligible but I think it's acceptable for the > benefit of being confidently able to distribute threaded apps. Just as a data point, in the "Python problems" with Zope, this, along with soe idiocy in packaging of RPMs in RedHat are the two biggest problems we have a the Python level. People not compiling with threads turned on, and RedHat's decision to ship the header files separate than the regular Python files. BLAH! Chris -- | Christopher Petrilli | petrilli@amber.org
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4