Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2000-June/004475.html below:

[Python-Dev] Revised 1.6 jobs list

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Revised 1.6 jobs list
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Revised 1.6 jobs list
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Barry A. Warsaw writes:
 > Did we ever decide on building in thread support by default?  I'd
 > really like to see threads enabled by default in 1.6 and I /think/
 > it'll just take some autoconf hacking, which I'm willing to do.  Are
 > there any objections to building in threads support by default if
 > autoconf detects threads?

  test_fork1 fails on Linux with threads on SMP machines.  (It's
irrelevant without threads.)  This is a hard failure -- the process
can either SEGV or hang forever.
  Is this a showstopper?  SMP boxes are becoming increasingly common
both as servers and workstations.


  -Fred

-- 
Fred L. Drake, Jr.  <fdrake at beopen.com>
BeOpen PythonLabs Team Member

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] Revised 1.6 jobs list
• Next message: [Python-Dev] Revised 1.6 jobs list
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4