On Sat, 3 Jun 2000, Moshe Zadka wrote: >... > In any case, is there any objection to storing the size of the .py > alongside it's mtime in the .pyc, and regenerating if either is changed? > This is just as efficient, and much more reliable. If we change the header size, then this would be fine. At the moment, I don't think that anybody is suggesting a change to the .pyc header format because of the number of tool breakages that would ensue. People have seemed interested in my idea to update the marshal format to record a version number -- it doesn't require a change to the .pyc header. Cheers, -g -- Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4