M.-A. Lemburg wrote: >I wonder why that patch hasn't been accepted yet -- I guess >the patches list needs some more people willing to review things >and of course people with check in permissions. One of the problems I'm having is keeping track of which patches are still outstanding. This is really a management/tools problem. I have a mailbox full of messages from the patches list -- some of the messages are patches, others are discussion. Some patches supercede others or are duplicates. It would help if we had better tools for managing the submitted/pending patches. SourceForge makes it a little more inconvenient to check which patches have been applied. Under the old CVS arrangement, it was a local operation to do a cvs log or diff. Now it's a slow network operation that requires authentication. (I really want a local mirror of the entire CVS repository!) Sorry for the excuses. I think better tools would help a lot, but we'll have to get more people checkin privileges regardless. Jeremy
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4