On Mon, Jul 31, 2000 at 01:31:36PM -0400, Jeremy Hylton wrote: > Which interface do you like better: the SourceForge bug tracker or > Jitterbug? I am leaning towards moving the bug database from > Jitterbug at python.org to SF. Without having too much experience with Jitterbug, and only the 'read' side at that, and slightly more experience, also only on the 'read' side, with the SF buglist, I can safely say I prefer the SF bug tracker. Jitterbug is totally alien to me, the different catagories boggle me, the overviews of each catagory boggle me, and I'm not sure if I've seen everything even after I browsed through each list. But as said, I have only little experience with Jitterbug. The SF buglist might not make it too clear from the first overview in what catagory a bug belongs, but it's easily selectable, and it's very obvious which bugs are open and how important they are. And it gives people more feedback on sourceforge, in case they don't read their mail ;-) -- Thomas Wouters <thomas@xs4all.net> Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread!
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4