On Thu, Jun 29, 2000 at 07:07:02PM +0200, Fredrik Lundh wrote: > trent wrote: > > I think (am I wrong?) to generalize that the intention for both Win32 and > > Win64 is to have _beginthread return an unsigned pointer-sized integer: hence > > uintptr_t. > > > > This would eliminate the #ifdef but would require a typedef for uintptr_t on > > Win32. This can be done in PC/config.h (I already did this for intptr_t, > > because I needed *that* elsewhere.) Does this also need to be generalized to > > typedef uintptr_t whereever it is not defined, i.e. in the autoconf files. > > > > I can look at this this weekend, if that is soon enough. > > I suggest checking in the #ifdef as a stopgap measure, if you > promise to come up with the right thing (whatever that is) in > time for 1.6 final. > > Should I go ahead and check it in? > Fredrik, I have put the "right thing" (I hope) up on SourceForge and assigned it to you: http://sourceforge.net/patch/?func=detailpatch&patch_id=101010&group_id=5470 I explained what I think is the right idea in the preceeding email in this thread: http://www.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2000-June/011800.html Could you try the patch and then assign it back to me for check in? (Or just check it in yourself) Thanks, Trent -- Trent Mick TrentM@ActiveState.com
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4