On Thu, Jul 27, 2000 at 05:38:59PM -0400, Eric S. Raymond wrote: >correcting minor errors and adding explanatory material. The question >is what to do next, and that turns on whether discursive tutorial sections >are are considered fit for inclusion in the library reference. That's up to Fred to decide. I suspect the answer is no, since it would make the library reference too large and ungainly if every section had a tutorial. Regular expressions, socket programming, and XML processing are all sizable topics in their own right that would be covered. I will re-raise the idea of adding the HOWTOs to the documentation subtree, though; Fred & I have discussed it before, and decided not to for reasons that I can't remember. >Can anybody point me at the TeX source for the curses HOWTO? I'l mail it to you privately. >Also, I'm not sure where the material for curses.textbox should go. New >section? Or a subsection in the curses document? Probably a subsection, but again, Fred has final ruling on that. --amk
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4