tim wrote: > [/F] > > would it be a good idea to add \UXXXXXXXX > > (8 hex digits) to 2.0? > > > > (only characters in the 0000-ffff range would > > be accepted in the current version, of course). >=20 > In which case there seems darned little point to it now <wink/frown>. with Python's approach to escape codes, it's not exactly easy to *add* a new escape code -- you risk breaking code that for some reason (intentional or not) relies on u"\U12345678" to end up as a backslash followed by 9 characters... not very likely, but I've seen stranger things... (btw, can you walk over to Guido's office and tell him why \x should ignore anything but the last two hex digits, no matter what string type we're using...) </F>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4