A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2000-July/007444.html below:

[Python-Dev] test_fork1.py failing (Summary or failing regression tests...)

[Python-Dev] test_fork1.py failing (Summary or failing regression tests...) [Python-Dev] test_fork1.py failing (Summary or failing regression tests...)Trent Mick trentm@ActiveState.com
Wed, 26 Jul 2000 09:32:32 -0700
On Wed, Jul 26, 2000 at 10:11:40AM +0200, M . -A . Lemburg wrote:
> Trent Mick wrote:
> > 
> > On Linux32:
> > - test_fork1
> >   This fails/hangs/crashes inconsistently because (some little bird told me)
> >   the fork stuff and threads are incompatible. Am I right? Now that we are
> >   turning threads on by default what is the proper thing to do here? SHould
> >   test_fork1 be changed to skip if threads are enabled?
> 
> Does this mean that a stock Python 1.6/2.0 interpreter will
> not properly do fork() on Linux32 (even when using threads) ?
> 

As I said: *some little bird told me*. (I think it was David.) I don't know,
Marc-Andre. I am just waving a flag.

Ignorantly yours,
Trent


-- 
Trent Mick
TrentM@ActiveState.com



RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4