> is there any special reason why we cannot use colon instead > of "for"? Would conflict with the proposed syntax for range literals. Both [0:10] and [x : x in seq] have the same syntactical form. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.pythonlabs.com/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4