Greg Ewing <greg@cosc.canterbury.ac.nz>: > > What they want to be is an applicative sublanguage in functional > > style > > Um, that might be what *you* want them to be, but it's the > complete opposite of what *I* want them to be, which is a > way of getting away from all those convoluted combinator > constructs! So your theory is that non-intuitive procedural syntax so complex that it *needs* usability testing is better. Riiiight... -- <a href="http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr">Eric S. Raymond</a> "Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable." -- John F. Kennedy
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4