Trent Mick suggested: > [for x in [10,20,30]: for y in [1,2,3]: x+y] When designing the syntax, I decided to put the target expression first, because I wanted it to read declaratively. Also I think it's clearer when you can see right up front what it's going to be a list *of*. Greg Ewing, Computer Science Dept, +--------------------------------------+ University of Canterbury, | A citizen of NewZealandCorp, a | Christchurch, New Zealand | wholly-owned subsidiary of USA Inc. | greg@cosc.canterbury.ac.nz +--------------------------------------+
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4