>>>>> "AMK" == Andrew Kuchling <akuchlin@mems-exchange.org> writes: AMK> On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 06:08:18PM -0400, Eric S. Raymond AMK> wrote: >> Wrong answer. The right answer is to fix lambda (or some variant >> of lambda) to be a true lexical closure. AMK> Hm... hmmmm... fixing this has been suggested before, but AMK> always foundered on the fact that creating a closure required a AMK> cycle, which would leak memory. Now we have an optional GC AMK> that should handle this, so maybe fixing it can be revisited. AMK> (But this would mean that GC is essentially no longer optional AMK> -- maybe too radical a thing to do before we're sure about the AMK> new GC. 2.1, maybe?) I was thinking this would be a post 2.0 PEP. Jeremy
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4