On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 06:08:18PM -0400, Eric S. Raymond wrote: >Wrong answer. The right answer is to fix lambda (or some variant of lambda) >to be a true lexical closure. Hm... hmmmm... fixing this has been suggested before, but always foundered on the fact that creating a closure required a cycle, which would leak memory. Now we have an optional GC that should handle this, so maybe fixing it can be revisited. (But this would mean that GC is essentially no longer optional -- maybe too radical a thing to do before we're sure about the new GC. 2.1, maybe?) --amk
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4