M.-A. Lemburg <mal@lemburg.com>:
> I believe the above would cause much less confusion since
> it resembles standard Python "for" loop notation (making it
> intuitive for Python programmers) and is in syntax very
> similar to what "lambda" uses:
>
> lambda <vars>: <evaluated expr>
>
> List comprehension would then become something like:
>
> [for <vars> in <expr>: <evaluated expr>]
I agree with this proposal. It harmonizes well with the use of applicative
or functional notation.
--
<a href="http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr">Eric S. Raymond</a>
To make inexpensive guns impossible to get is to say that you're
putting a money test on getting a gun. It's racism in its worst form.
-- Roy Innis, president of the Congress of Racial Equality (CORE), 1988
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4