mal wrote:
> Wouldn't it make much more sense to write something
> more lambda function like, e.g.
>=20
> [for (x,y) in zip([10,20,30], [1,2,3]): x+y]
>=20
> or
>=20
> [for x in range(100): x*2]
fwiw, I read that as:
[
for x in range(100):
x * 2
]
which makes no sense at all.
</F>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4