> Well, there could probably be an improvement, but not one that would > *ensure* safe incremental builds. I don't believe that at all. The problem is that the submakefiles (in Parser, Objects, Python, and Modules) don't specify all dependencies on the header files in Include. If proper dependencies were added, the recursive make strategy would be totally fine. The toplevel Makefile always descends into each subdirectory to do whatever needs to be done there; there are some tricks so that the subdirectories know what to do and whether the toplevel libpython$(VERSION).a needs to be updated. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://dinsdale.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4