On Tue, Jul 25, 2000 at 12:51:39PM -0500, Guido van Rossum wrote: >Is the existing 3rd party BerkeleyDB broken, or just stylistically too >bad for inclusion in the core? If the latter, we could remove bsddb The latter. The existing module still works fine, particularly if you just need a DBM-like file that can also be traversed in sorted-key order, but it's not compatible with the current BerkeleyDB code. --amk
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4