Guido van Rossum writes: > Is the existing 3rd party BerkeleyDB broken, or just stylistically too > bad for inclusion in the core? If the latter, we could remove bsddb > from the core and refer to the 3rd party module -- assuming it has a > website and all. Pointing to the new extension from the documentation is certainly reasonable under any circumstance, with a note about why it may be interesting or useful as an alternate implementation. Does anyone have a URL I can use? -Fred -- Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fdrake at beopen.com> BeOpen PythonLabs Team Member
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4