guido wrote: > This is a (minor) open issue; I'd be happy with requiring >=20 > [(x, x*2) for x in seq] doesn't really change anything, does it? the (x, x*2) could still be a value tuple or an assignment target. I'm no parser expert, but doesn't this mean that we're ruling out certain kinds of parsers? </F>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4