Guido van Rossum wrote: > > Here's my current timeline > (I'll post this on the web when we have access): > > - 1.6beta1 out around August 1 > - 1.6final around August 15 > - 2.0beta1 around August 30 > - various betas > - 2.0final around September 30 > > Obviously not every PEP will be included in 2.0. I plan on including > these: zip(); list comprehensions; augmented assignments; range > literals. Also whatever's in pep-0200. How about adding XML support as the "Big New Feature" to 2.0 instead of 1.6 (if I remember correctly, XML was added after the BeOpen move, right) ? Not that I have anything against XML going into 1.6, but this would make the new version number a little more understandable. BTW, how rock solid is Python's builtin XML support ? I'm asking because I want to make our product XML aware and the various different parser implementations out there gave me a rather unsecure feeling about which one to go after... -- Marc-Andre Lemburg ______________________________________________________________________ Business: http://www.lemburg.com/ Python Pages: http://www.lemburg.com/python/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4