Fredrik Lundh wrote: > > not sure about the outcome here; should I go ahead > and check it in? (properly ANSIfied, of course): > > http://sourceforge.net/patch/?func=detailpatch&patch_id=100895&group_id=5470 +0 I would still like to see the snprintf() fallback solution somewhere in there, but what the heck... go ahead ;-) -- Marc-Andre Lemburg ______________________________________________________________________ Business: http://www.lemburg.com/ Python Pages: http://www.lemburg.com/python/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4