On Mon, Jul 24, 2000 at 03:02:04PM +0200, Fredrik Lundh wrote: >if this is true, I really want a separate list for those of us who'd >rather work on improving the implementation and the standard >library. Seconded. There's lots of unsexy but useful stuff to be done simply making the core distribution a bit more solid or a bit faster, the demos a bit more up-to-date, the docs a bit more complete, &c. I think that part of my dislike of new language features stems from the redirection of effort away from such basic tasks. Can hardly wait until PEP-related discussion finds its new home, whether on c.l.p or on a pep-dev list. --amk
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4