barry wrote: > I'm beginning to think that our role on python-dev is different than > we thought. I think for a particular proposal for a new language > feature, or core language functionality, it is our job to explore the > details and ramifications as much as possible. if this is true, I really want a separate list for those of us who'd rather work on improving the implementation and the standard library. after all, adding more syntactic fl^H^Hstuff isn't the only way to improve Python... (and I'm pretty sure it's not the best way to improve it, either) </F>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4