A couple people have responded to my comment about deprecating the string
without deprecating map(). Most recently, Tim stated:
>> As far as I'm aware, there's no clean way to do that with string
>> methods.
Tim> Sorry if someone pointed this out already (2K+ msgs backed up!):
Tim> newlist = [s.strip() for s in oldlist]
I realized that list comprehensions were possible, but they aren't yet in
the language, so I didn't think them a fair substitute for
map(string.strip, oldlist)
If you get list comprehensions in there in some guise, then sure, deprecate
away...
Skip
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4