[M.-A. Lemburg] > BTW, what happened to the CWI copyright ? It seems to be missing > completely from the CNRI text... could be that we'll have > to fight with three different license texts which all apply > to 2.0 in the future. > > Why not simply make Python public-domain instead ? CNRI wanted a new licence, and CNRI wrote the new license text. Their motivations and reasoning were-- and remain --a mystery to me (not in the sense that I didn't understand them, but in the plainer sense that I was never told -- everything they said on the subject consisted of the single msg Guido forwarded to c.l.py, which said nothing specific -- perhaps they said more at the consortium mtg? don't know). Can only suggest you direct questions to the people Guido named in his announcement (Dr. Kahn at CNRI, Bob Weiner at BeOpen).
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4