On Sun, Jul 23, 2000 at 03:07:18AM -0400, Barry A. Warsaw wrote: > Forget about @, let's use >> instead. What I mean by "red herring" is > that it doesn't much matter what the token after print is -- we can > argue about that all we want later. As long as the token can't appear > in that position with any other meaningful semantics, you're fine. > print >> sys.stdout, 'post to', listname, 'from', sender, 'size=', len(msg) Eventhough I said I'd prefer deprecating 'print' over doing something like this, I can actually see this work. '>>' on files has two meanings: the C++ one, and the UNIX one. I'm still not sure if it's a good idea, but given this example and the arguments for it, I'm not violently opposed anymore. -- Thomas Wouters <thomas@xs4all.net> Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread!
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4