Mark Hammond wrote: > > Anyway, I believe we have both made our points, and in the interests of > preventing this from becoming a real flame-fest, I will refrain from > further comments in this vein, and simply place my faith in the benevolent > dictator. I don't want put oil in the fire. That said, I wouldn't place to much faith in the BDFL rejecting those features. Not after this statement: "- Python 2.0 (a BeOpen PythonLabs release) will start with a beta release 1-2 weeks after 1.6 final is released; we're striving for a short beta cycle. New language features will include list comprehensions, range literals, the zip() function, and augmented assignment." of-course-maybe-I-should-read-"will"-as-"could"-ly y'rs Peter -- Peter Schneider-Kamp ++47-7388-7331 Herman Krags veg 51-11 mailto:peter@schneider-kamp.de N-7050 Trondheim http://schneider-kamp.de
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4