This is the first name I've seen that is clearly self-descriptive:
maketuples. It is a little bit wordy but it is also pretty darn clear
about what is going on!
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: merge (Re: zip or marry etc)
Date: 20 Jul 2000 11:53:49 -0400
From: Dan Schmidt <dfan@harmonixmusic.com>
Organization: Harmonix Musick Systems
To: python-list@python.org
Newsgroups: comp.lang.python
References: <20000718100813.C21354@newcnri.cnri.reston.va.us>
<39763FF4.2CA5BF75@schneider-kamp.de>
<8l59pa$6ff$1@slb1.atl.mindspring.net>
<slrn8nd7s8.gtf.scarblac-spamtrap@flits104-37.flits.rug.nl>
<8l6vc5$c07$1@slb6.atl.mindspring.net>
<+MLEAgA0Lxd5EwDd@jessikat.fsnet.co.uk>
...
zip is fine with me, but if we were to choose a brand-new name, I like
the make_pairs that someone proposed, or, since I guess it can work on
more than two lists, make_tuples. Or how about tuple_up? :)
--
Dan Schmidt | http://www.dfan.org
Honest Bob CD now available! | http://www.dfan.org/honestbob/cd.html
--
http://www.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4