"Barry A. Warsaw" wrote: > > I've long wanted to make the print statement able to handle > alternative output files in a more convenient syntax. Yes you can > rebind sys.stdout, but that is often very clumsy to get right in the > face of exceptions. Why not use outputfile.write directly? print is such a hack already. What are we trying to get at, really? What are the virtues of print, what are the virtues of "outputfile.write" and how can we combine them? -- Paul Prescod - Not encumbered by corporate consensus New from Computer Associates: "Software that can 'think', sold by marketers who choose not to."
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4