[Tim]
>> Didn't we go thru this before? If "expensive hardware" means SGI, Guido
>> said commit SGI ANSIfication patches.
[Thomas Wouters]
> OS/2, NT, etc, are quite a bit different from SGI. SGI is UNIX, which I
> grok. I can't claim the same for NT ;P
NT is expensive hardware? That MS .NET project is more ambitious than I
thought <wink>.
>> commit ... commit ... commit
> Will do.
Excellent.
> ...
> Each time you post one of these 'go ahead and do it' messages, I go
> ahead and do it, thinking to myself, "he said that before". And then
> the next time I see something I'm not quite sure about, I think "he
> said to go ahead and do it... but that was not about 'this', it was
> about the slightly different 'that' instead." ;P
>
> Simply-trying-not-to-overstep-my-bounds-ly y'rs,
There's no way to find out your bounds *except* by going beyond them --
which, happily enough, is also the way to expand your bounds. If we didn't
think you were a perfectly wonderful human being, you wouldn't have gotten
commit access to begin with. Do note that Guido has yelled at people only a
few times here so far, and all of those on the receiving end are still
here -- including me. But then he was surely wrong to yell at me <wink>.
an-exaggerated-sense-of-one's-own-importance-is-a-virtue-
in-this-field-ly y'rs - tim
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4