On Thu, 20 Jul 2000, Thomas Wouters wrote: > On Thu, Jul 20, 2000 at 05:49:20PM +0200, M.-A. Lemburg wrote: > > [Adding new operators] > > > Just a side note before everyone forgets: I think we'll > > need to carefully redefine coercion *before* adding any > > new slots/operators/etc. to Python. > > > The current model where coercion is centralized won't > > scale well with the new operators. My (old) proposal for this > > (see my Python Pages) was to decentralize coercion and > > make the coercion process part of the operators task. > > > Thoughts ? > Just a note. The additional operators for numerical computation have exactly the same properties as the conventional math operators. Their default on numbers are identical. Don't know if this is relevant, though. > Agreed. I also think, but that's a personal opinion, that adding new > operators should be done carefully, and I'm not sure if 2.0 is the right > time for it. It depends on how far away 2.0 is, of course, not just to make > sure the operators are implemented right, with clear semantics and > everything, but also to give everyone a chance to accept the idea of new > operators ;P Any timeline? Huaiyu
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4