Skip Montanaro wrote: > > ... > > I don't think so. I suspect most people use dir() interactively to see what > attributes an object supports and would appreciate the improved > functionality. Besides, we are talking 2.0 here. Nothing wrong with a > little breakage... ;-) I think that Thomas is right that there is going to be a fair bit of code that manually worked around this limitation in dir and now will get two copies of some attributes. What do you think about attrs( foo ) It's more descriptive anyhow. -- Paul Prescod - Not encumbered by corporate consensus "Hardly anything more unwelcome can befall a scientific writer than having the foundations of his edifice shaken after the work is finished. I have been placed in this position by a letter from Mr. Bertrand Russell..." - Frege, Appendix of Basic Laws of Arithmetic (of Russell's Paradox)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4