On Thu, Jul 20, 2000 at 05:49:20PM +0200, M.-A. Lemburg wrote: > [Adding new operators] > Just a side note before everyone forgets: I think we'll > need to carefully redefine coercion *before* adding any > new slots/operators/etc. to Python. > The current model where coercion is centralized won't > scale well with the new operators. My (old) proposal for this > (see my Python Pages) was to decentralize coercion and > make the coercion process part of the operators task. > Thoughts ? Agreed. I also think, but that's a personal opinion, that adding new operators should be done carefully, and I'm not sure if 2.0 is the right time for it. It depends on how far away 2.0 is, of course, not just to make sure the operators are implemented right, with clear semantics and everything, but also to give everyone a chance to accept the idea of new operators ;P -- Thomas Wouters <thomas@xs4all.net> Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread!
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4