Peter Schneider-Kamp wrote: > > Moshe Zadka wrote: > > > > My fault -- I stopped reading /. Can you summarize the thread? > > The thread is about if Visual Python is an alternative for > Visual Basic or, if not, it can be used as that. > > A subthread of this thread dealt with Pythons release schedule: > "Speaking of Python, does anyone know what's up with Python 1.6^H^H2.0? > A while back, python.org had said that version 1.6 would be out on > June 1. Then there was an announcement, mid-June that it would be > delayed. Then at the end of June, this link was placed on python.org, > and it was stated that the Python interpreter, version 1.6, was > renamed to 2.0, and the first beta would be available on July 1. Now, > on July 17, that link has been removed from python.org (although the > webpage still exists), and the release schedule is gone!" > > Quoting from relevant replies: > "python 1.6 will be out in august > check the downloads page of www.python.org > or checkout the pythonlabs at www.beopen.com > where most of the core python developers opened shop" > > "Yeah, the Python 1.6 download page says that Python 1.6 beta1 will be > done on July 1, and beta 2 on July 14. It's July 17 now, and the only > available download is alpha 2...." You may not have noticed, but the 2.0beta1 is already available to the public: just download the most recent CVS version (or the tarball from David Ascher's starship page). About the schedule: I think we'll know more after the Python Consortium Meeting. -- Marc-Andre Lemburg ______________________________________________________________________ Business: http://www.lemburg.com/ Python Pages: http://www.lemburg.com/python/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4