On Wed, 19 Jul 2000, Ka-Ping Yee wrote: > On Wed, 19 Jul 2000, Barry A. Warsaw wrote: > > > > I've been thinking a little bit about the other generators, especially > > irange(). I wonder if we shouldn't just be putting zip() and friends > > in their own Python module and not make them builtins? > > I'd say put both zip() and irange() in builtins. They're useful enough. One of the things I love about Python is the clean namespaces. Each builtin function takes away some of the cleanliness. It's a tradeof, but I think we should be wary of tossing stuff into builtins just because we can't find a good place for them. -- Moshe Zadka <moshez@math.huji.ac.il> There is no GOD but Python, and HTTP is its prophet. http://advogato.org/person/moshez
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4