"Barry A. Warsaw" wrote: > >... > > > The second possibility is that user code must `appear' to special case > the situation when the number of sequences is exactly 1. I.e. > > >>> for (i,) in zip((1, 2, 3)): > > instead of the more natural (because it's less to type and because of > the map() heritage): > > >>> for i in zip((1, 2, 3)): Why are you using zip in this case? If you *know* that you are going to get back 1-tuples then you must know that the input is a single list (i.e. you aren't using "apply"). So why are you using zip at all? -- Paul Prescod - Not encumbered by corporate consensus Just how compassionate can a Republican get before he has to leave the GOP and join Vegans for Global Justice? ... One moment, George W. Bush is holding a get-to-know-you meeting with a bunch of gay Republicans. The next he is holding forth on education or the environment ... It is enough to make a red-blooded conservative choke on his spotted-owl drumstick. - April 29th, Economist
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4