On Wed, 19 Jul 2000, Peter Schneider-Kamp wrote: > I know this has probably been discussed many times, but > a) I haven't been around that long and > b) there is a TBD in nondist/peps/pep-206.txt :-] > > What would it take to include NumPy with the "Batteries included" > release of Python? Well, as maintainer of 206, I'd like to answer that: user requests. I haven't done any numeric programming for some time now, so I'm out of touch with this world. I'm planning of preparing 206 for c.l.py discussion this weekend. > BTW: What about kjBuckets and some other modules that have > been proposed? They are not in the PEP. Well, my usual rule is that anyone proposing a new module must do the web research necessary to find out where is the official place to download a known working version from. -- Moshe Zadka <moshez@math.huji.ac.il> There is no GOD but Python, and HTTP is its prophet. http://advogato.org/person/moshez
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4