Andrew Kuchling <akuchlin@cnri.reston.va.us> writes: > Thanks to everyone who made some suggestions. The more minor > edits have been made, but I haven't added any of the threads I missed > because doing a long stretch of Emacs editing in this lame Windows terminal > program will drive me insane, so I just posted the summary to python-list. > > <rant>How is it possible for Microsoft to not get a VT100-compatible > terminal program working correctly? VT100s have been around since, > when, the 1970s? Can anyone suggest a Windows terminal program that > *doesn't* suck dead bunnies through a straw?</rant> Windows 2000's is (much!) better. Putty is also good; it lives at http://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/putty/ Cheers, M.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4