On Tue, Jul 18, 2000 at 09:18:31AM -0500, Skip Montanaro wrote: > Thomas> Now that everyone of importance is off to sunny California, how > Thomas> about we put some of the patches that have been idling on the SF > Thomas> PM to the vote ? > As someone who has been assigned some patches that are still open (isatty, > normpath fix, history functions for readline), Don't forget: you can assign them to someone else if you feel you have too much, or if you aren't the right person, or just don't feel like dealing with that patch. > I'm still pretty much in the dark about what my rights and > responsibilities are. Am I supposed to eyeball a patch and check it in if > it looks okay (compiles, doesn't break "make test", etc)? Yes, at the least. Also whether it complies to coding style, includes a test (when necessary), etc. > Am I supposed to bring it up for discussion on > python-dev? Possibly. I donno. That used to be done on patches, I gather, but that list is kind of defunct, now. That's partly why I wrote the first posting in this thread, to bring some of those patches to attention. I don't think you're intended to be the Guardian Angel of those patches, though, just the one checking them out. If you aren't sure, post here (or patches@python.org), I guess. If you can't figure out what to do, assign it to Tim<wink><wink>. -- Thomas Wouters <thomas@xs4all.net> Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread!
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4