Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2000-July/006894.html below:

[Python-Dev] Re: PEP 201 - Parallel iteration

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 201 - Parallel iteration
• Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 201 - Parallel iteration
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

I realize it's late in the day, but could the name of the concept (not the
function) be changed from "parallel iteration" to something that doesn't
imply concurrent execution quite so strongly?  I think the use of
"parallel" is very likely to mislead, particularly scientists and
engineers who actually have parallel loops in their jumped-up Fortran and
C++ systems.

Thanks,
Greg

• Previous message: [Python-Dev] PEP 201 - Parallel iteration
• Next message: [Python-Dev] PEP 201 - Parallel iteration
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4