On Mon, 17 Jul 2000, Barry A. Warsaw wrote: [On the builtin that resembles lambda *args: map(None, *args)] > High bit: Guido strongly prefers zip() as the name of the built-in. > All the suggestions so far have pluses and minuses, and in the absence > of a clear winner, he'd just as soon go with the Haskell name. I > agree. > > Please see the new reference implementation, which includes a > __len__() method, and the discussion of the rejected elaborations. > There's still the open issue of what zip(sequence_a) should return. I'm +1 on that. One thing that bugs me is that we're adding a builtin type. Why not stick with the Python implementation? -- Moshe Zadka <moshez@math.huji.ac.il> There is no GOD but Python, and HTTP is its prophet. http://advogato.org/person/moshez
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4