On Mon, Jul 17, 2000 at 03:06:13PM -0400, Barry A. Warsaw wrote: > There's still the open issue of what zip(sequence_a) should return. I'd vote for [(a,), (b,), (c,)], that is, still return tuples. It's consistent with the use in the case of multiple sequences. We already have map(None, sequence_a) that does it the non-obvious way ;) In the map case it's easily explained: it turns the sequence into a list. In the case of zip(), that isn't necessary (and not the point of the function, anyway.) I-still-wish-it-were-marry()-ly y'rs, ;) -- Thomas Wouters <thomas@xs4all.net> Hi! I'm a .signature virus! copy me into your .signature file to help me spread!
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4