On Mon, 17 Jul 2000, M.-A. Lemburg wrote: > > But what I particularly like is the inspect.py module. That > would make a great addition to the standard lib ! Yes, i consider inspect.py pretty much done, and hoped it would be considered for the standard library. I proposed it a little while ago (http://www.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2000-May/011031.html); but it was set aside during the feature freeze. If we are in a position to consider it again now, then yes, i'd like to suggest it for the standard library. > Note to Ping: your files are missing a clear license notice. I thought we didn't have to add the contribution release form anymore because that was for CNRI? Anyway, i added a comment. Is it sufficient? # I, Ka-Ping Yee, the author of this contribution, hereby grant to anyone and # everyone a nonexclusive, irrevocable, royalty-free, worldwide license to # reproduce, distribute, perform and/or display publicly, prepare derivative # versions, and otherwise use this contribution as part of the Python software # and its related documentation, or any derivative versions thereof, at no cost # to anyone, and to authorize others to do so. -- ?!ng
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4