Gordon McMillan wrote: > > M.-A. Lemburg, > > > Thomas Wouters wrote: > > [deprecate / depreciate] > > > It seems that one is stronger than the other. I'll stick with the > > weaker one ;-) > > One is passive. Your new car depreciates in value, whether > Guido says it should or not. Ok ok... :-) I'll remove the "i" from "depreciated" and will instead try to add the "n" to "unkown" -- promised ;-) > > > > > Besides, 'string.join' is a good compromise for the people > > > > > who don't like " ".join() > > > Fine... but it'll cause a performance hit when used in tight > > loops (function call + method lookup). They should use somehting > > like: > > > > spacejoin = ' '.join > > spacejoin(sequence) > > > > instead. > > It's become very obvious that you haven't read c.l.py in quite > awhile. That's true -- don't have time for that anymore. I usually only scan the newsgroup for articles related to my mx stuff and database/datetime related things. For me, python-dev has become the new home. -- Marc-Andre Lemburg ______________________________________________________________________ Business: http://www.lemburg.com/ Python Pages: http://www.lemburg.com/python/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4