Greg Stein wrote: > > ... > > urllib should NOT try to parse a "doc:" scheme. Any scheme in urllib should > ONLY be IANA-registered schemes, and the resulting URL should follow the > appropriate RFCs. > > If doc: is ever registered, then go ahead and teach it to urllib. Until > then, I'll scream and shout and be very annoying :-) Actually, the URL specs are specifically designed to be extensible and to allow local, community-oriented URL (or URN) prefixes. It is a deficiency of urllib that it cannot be taught to deal with new URLs without changing its code. You can extend Java's URL handler or Windows URL handler "externally." Anyhow, I am light years ahead from doing anything in that vein. -- Paul Prescod - Not encumbered by corporate consensus It's difficult to extract sense from strings, but they're the only communication coin we can count on. - http://www.cs.yale.edu/~perlis-alan/quotes.html
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4